Comparing Covid Laws by King, Jeff; Luiz Motta Ferraz, Octávio;

A Critical Global Survey

10% KEDVEZMÉNY?
A kedvezmény csak az 'Értesítés a kedvenc témákról' hírlevelünk címzettjeinek rendeléseire érvényes.

Kiadói listaár GBP 125.00
Az ár azért becsült, mert a rendelés pillanatában nem lehet pontosan tudni, hogy a beérkezéskor milyen lesz a forint árfolyama az adott termék eredeti devizájához képest. Ha a forint romlana, kissé többet, ha javulna, kissé kevesebbet kell majd fizetnie.

59 718 Ft (56 875 Ft + 5% áfa)
Kedvezmény(ek) 10% (cc. 5 972 Ft off)
Kedvezményes ár 53 747 Ft (51 188 Ft + 5% áfa)

59 718 Ft

Beszerezhetőség

Még nem jelent meg, de rendelhető. A megjelenéstől számított néhány héten belül megérkezik.

A termék adatai:

Kiadó OUP Oxford
Megjelenés dátuma 2026. január 6.

ISBN 9780198899891
Kötéstípus Keménykötés
Terjedelem406 oldal
Méret 234x156 mm
Nyelv angol

Kategóriák

Jogtudomány általában, kézikönyvek Közigazgatási és alkotmányjog További könyvek a jog területén

Rövid leírás:

This book offers a critical examination of how fifty-three countries responded legally and constitutionally to the Covid-19 pandemic. The book explores whether and how these countries respected basic principles of democracy and human rights while trying to minimise transmission and deaths caused by the virus.

Több

Hosszú leírás:

The Covid-19 pandemic brought about both the most serious public health crisis as well as, for many states, the most profound public interventions in individual liberties in the last century. Comparing Covid Laws: A Critical Global Survey examines the evidence of how fifty-three countries from around the world fared at providing an efficacious response within a framework respecting the rule of law, rights, and democratic government.

The book draws primarily on data gathered within the Lex-Atlas: Covid-19 (LAC19) project, a worldwide collaboration of jurists that produced the fifty-three detailed and structurally identical country reports published in The Oxford Compendium of National Legal Responses to Covid-19. This volume contains the considered critical judgments of the editorial committee of the Compendium. Over the course of twelve chapters, the text examines a wide range of topics including; the use of emergency powers to address the health crisis, the role of courts, the impact on women's rights, on privacy, on workers and on the right to protest. It also discusses how pandemic responses unfolded in particular ways in cities, federal countries and authoritarian settings.

Editors Jeff King and Octávio Luiz Motta Ferraz, as well as the contributors, were motivated by the belief, defended in the introduction of the book, that a good pandemic response is not simply one that achieves better outcomes in terms of morbidity and mortality, a topic that dominated discussions throughout the health crisis. A good pandemic response, they argue, is also one that pursues these goals in a manner that respects democracy, the rule of law, and human rights.

Több

Tartalomjegyzék:

Introduction: Assessing Global Legal Responses to Covid-19
The Legislative Measures Model of Public Health Emergency Powers in Global Perspective
The Legal Response to Covid-19 in Federal Systems
Cities in the Legal Response to Covid-19
Pandemic Litigation and the Rule of Law: A Global Comparative Survey of the Role of Courts During the Health Crisis
Comparing Covid-19 Responses: Public Health and Human Rights
Covid-19 and the Interplay Between National Law and International Health Norms
Covid-19 and the Labour Market: Crisis and the Rediscovery of Social Law
Pandemic Continuities through a Gendered Lens
Privacy, Informational Infrastructures, and Covid-19: Comparative Legal Responses
Opportunistic Use of Covid-19 Protest Restrictions: A Comparative Perspective
(Il)legal Responses to Covid-19 in Autocratization Settings

Több

Mostanában megtekintett