History of Linguistics by Joseph, John E;

Rövid leírás:

johnjoseph

Index

Hosszú leírás:

Although the academic field of linguistics is a product of the 19^th century, the form of enquiry into language which it designates is continuous with modes of analysis that date back to ancient times, as practised in various traditions in Asia and Europe (together with the African parts of the Alexandrian Empire). The history of linguistics has taken its scope as ranging over the whole of this ancient-to-modern continuum. Given that language and its analysis have played a part in every academic area, it is not obvious where the boundaries of the history of linguistics lie, and scholarly disputes over where to draw them are not uncommon. This set of volumes will focus on the prototypical areas of language analysis, whilst not excluding those areas which, if more peripheral, have nevertheless had a considerable impact on what linguists think and do. It thus attempts to strike a balance between the breadth that historians of linguistics value, and the need to avoid superficiality when it comes to the core of the discipline as currently practised. This is, after all, a set of volumes that will be aimed not just at people already working in the history of linguistics, but at practitioners and students of linguistics who are delving into its history for the first time.

Tartalomjegyzék:

History of Linguistics: Critical Concepts in Linguistics

Edited by John E. Joseph

Volume 1: Ancient Europe and Asia

Contents

Acknowledgements

Introduction: Bounding the history of linguistics (John E. Joseph)

1. Deborah Levine Gera, ‘The Invention of Language’, in Ancient Greek Ideas on Speech, Language, and Civilization (Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, 2003), pp. 112-181.








2. Anneli Luhtala, ‘On Definitions in Ancient Grammar’, in Pierre Swiggers & Alphons Wouters (eds), Grammatical Theory and Philosophy of Language in Antiquity (Leuven & Paris: Peeters (Orbis Supplementa, 2002), pp. 257-285.








3. Daniel J. Taylor, ‘Rewriting the History of Linguistics in Classical Antiquity’, in Gerda Hassler and Gesina Volkmann (eds), History of Linguistics 2008: Selected Papers from the Eleventh International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences (ICHoLS XI), 28 August-2 September 2008, Potsdam (Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2011), pp. 109-125.








4. Norman Kretzmann, ‘History of Semantics’, in Paul Edwards (ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. 7, (New York: Macmillan, 1967), pp. 358-406.








5. J. F. Staal, ‘Sanskrit Philosophy of Language’, in Hermann Parret (ed.), History of Linguistic Thought and Contemporary Linguistics (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1976), pp. 102-136.








6. Christoph Harbsmeier, ‘Traditional Chinese Comments on Language’, and ‘The Art of Grammar in Traditional China’, excerpts in Joseph Needham (ed.) Science and Civilisation in China, Vol. 7, Part I: Language and Logic (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), pp. 46-54, 85-95.








7. William S-Y. Wang and 王士元. ‘Language in China: A Chapter in the History of Linguistics / 汉语语言学发展的历史回顾’, Journal of Chinese Linguistics 17, 2, 1989, 183-222.








8. Roy Andrew Miller, ‘The Japanese Linguistic Tradition and the Chinese Heritage’, in Sylvain Auroux et al (eds), History of the Language Sciences (Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter, 2000), pp. 72-77.








9. Jonathan Owens, ‘History’, in Jonathan Owens (ed), The Oxford Handbook of Arabic Linguistics, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 451-471.








10. Wout Jac van Bekkum, ‘Hebrew’, in The Emergence of Semantics in Four Linguistic Traditions: Hebrew, Sanskrit, Greek, Arabic (Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1997), pp. 3-47.







Volume 2: Mediaeval and Renaissance







11. L. G. Kelly, ‘Vox, Articulation and Porphyry’, The Mirror of Grammar: Theology, Philosophy and the Modistae (Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2002), pp. 1-38.








12. Irene E. Zwiep, ‘The Hebrew Linguistic Tradition of the Middle Ages’, Histoire-Épistémologie-Langage 18, 1, 1996, 41-61.








13. Geoffrey Bursill-Hall, ‘The Grammatical Theories and Techniques of the Modistae’, in Speculative Grammar in the Middle Ages: The Doctrine of Partes Orationis of the Modistae (The Hague: Mouton, 1972), pp. 37-65.








14. Umberto Eco, Excerpt on ‘Dante’s De vulgari eloquentia’, in The Search for the Perfect Language, translated by James Fentress (Malden, MA & Oxford: Blackwell, 1995 [1993]), pp. 34-52.








15. Anneli Luhtala, ‘Pedagogical Grammars before the 18th Century’, in Keith Allan (ed.), Oxford Handbook of the History of Linguistics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 341-358.








16. R. H. Robins, ‘The Byzantine Grammarians’. Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure 51, 1998, 29-38.








17. Mark Amsler, ‘Premodern Letters and Textual Consciousness from the Pre-Socratics to the First Grammatical Treatise’, Historiographia Linguistica 37, 2010, 279-319.








18. Vivien Law, ‘The Renaissance: Discovery of the Outer World’, in The History of Linguistics in Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp. 210-257.








19. Jeffrey Wollock, ‘Moisture and the Tongue in the Renaissance’, in The Noblest Animate Motion: Speech, Physiology, and Medicine in Pre-Cartesian Linguistic Thought (Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1997), pp. 231-260.








20. Wendy Ayres-Bennett, ‘Reading the Remarqueurs: Changing Perceptions of "Classic" Texts’. Historiographia Linguistica 33, 3, 2006, 263-302.








21. Noam Chomsky, ‘Creative Aspect of Language Use’ in Cartesian Linguistics: A Chapter in the History of Rational Thought, 3^rd ed. (New York: Harper and Row, 2009 [1966]), pp. 59-77.








22. Noam Chomsky, ‘Deep and Surface Structure’, in Cartesian Linguistics: A Chapter in the History of Rational Thought, 3^rd ed. (New York: Harper and Row, 2009 [1966]), pp. 78-92.








23. Vivian Salmon, ‘Review of Cartesian Linguistics’, Journal of Linguistics 5, 1, 1969, 165-187.








24. Robin Lakoff, ‘Review of Herbert H. Brekle (ed.), Grammaire générale et raisonnée’, Language 45, 1969, 343-364.








25. W. Keith. Percival, ‘On the Non-Existence of Cartesian Linguistics’, in R. J. Butler (ed.), Cartesian Studies (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1972), pp. 137-145.








26. Otto Zwartjes, ‘Missionary Linguistics in Japan’, in Portuguese Missionary Grammars in Asia, Africa and Brazil, 1550-1800 (Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2011), pp. 93-142.







Volume 3: Enlightenment through 19th Century







27. Talbot J. Taylor, ‘On How We Ought to Understand’, in Mutual Misunderstanding: Scepticism and the Theorizing of Language and Interpretation (Duke University Press, 1992), pp. 27-47.








28. Hans Aarsleff, ‘Condillac’s Speechless Statue’, Studia Leibnitzia, supplementa xv, 1975, 287-302.








29. Julie Tetel Andresen, ‘In the Beginning: The Political Conception of Language’, in Linguistics in America, 1769-1924: A Critical History (London & New York: Routledge, 1990), pp. 22-67.








30. Hilary Chappell and Alain Peyraube. ‘The History of Chinese Grammars in Chinese and Western Scholarly Traditions’, Language and History 57, 2, 2015, 107-136.








31. Matthew Lauzon, ‘Welsh Indians and Savage Scots: History, Antiquarianism, and Indian Languages in 18th-century Britain’, History of European Ideas, 34, 3, 2008, 250-269.








32. Christiane Schlaps, ‘The "Genius of Language": Transformations of a Concept in the History of Linguistics’, Historiographia Linguistica 31, 2-3, 2004, 367-388.








33. Thomas R. Trautmann, ‘Discovering Aryan and Dravidian in British India: A Tale of Two Cities’, Historiographia Linguistica 31, 1, 2004, 33-58.








34. Micaela Verlato, ‘The Challenge of Polysynthesis: Wilhelm von Humboldt and Early Comparative Americanist Linguistics’, Language and History 58, 2, 2016, 82-94.








35. James Turner, ‘From Philology to Linguistics, 1800-1850’, in Philology (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014), pp. 125-146.








36. Michel Foucault, ‘Bopp’ and ‘Language Become Object’, excerpts from The Order of Things: An Archeology of the Human Sciences, anon. trans. (London & New York: Routledge, 2005 [1966]), pp. 305-329.








37. Tuska Benes, ‘Comparative Linguistics: Race, Religion, and Historical Agency, 1830-1880’, In Babel’s Shadow: Language, Philology, and the Nation in Nineteenth Century Germany (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 2008), pp. 197-239.








38. Holger Pedersen, ‘The Study of Non-Indo-European Families of Languages’, in The Discovery of Language: Linguistic Science in the Nineteenth Century (Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1931), 99-140.








39. Stephen G. Alter, ‘Darwin and the Linguists: The Coevolution of Mind and Language. Part 1. Problematic Friends’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38, 2007, 573-584.








40. Stephen G. Alter, ‘Darwin and the Linguists: The Coevolution of Mind and Language’, Part 2. The Language-thought Relationship’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 39, 2008, 38-50.








41. N. E. Collinge, ‘History of Historical Linguistics’, in E. F. K. Koerner and R. E. Asher (eds), Concise History of the Language Sciences (Oxford: Pergamon, 1992), pp. 203-212.








42. E. F. K. Koerner, ‘Concluding Remarks’, from ‘European Structuralism: Early Beginnings’, in Thomas A. Sebeok (eds), Current Trends in Linguistics, vol. 13, Historiography of Linguistics (The Hague: Mouton, 1975), pp. 803-808.







Volume 4: 20^th-21^st Centuries, and the Historiography of Linguistics







43. Giorgio Graffi, ‘European Linguistics Since Saussure’, in Keith Allan (ed.), Oxford Handbook of the History of Linguistics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 469-484.








44. Stephen R. Anderson, ‘American Structuralist Phonology’, in Phonology in the Twentieth Century: Theories of Rules and Theories of Representations (Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press, 1985), pp. 277-309.








45. Stephen R. Anderson, ‘Generative Phonology and its Origins’, in Phonology in the Twentieth Century: Theories of Rules and Theories of Representations (Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press, 1985), pp. 310-327.








46. Peter H. Matthews, ‘Bloomfield’s Mature Theory’, and ‘The Post-Bloomfieldians’, excerpts in Grammatical Theory in the United States from Bloomfield to Chomsky (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), pp. 62-85.








47. E. F. K. Koerner, ‘The Origins of Morphophonemics in American Linguistics’, in Toward a History of American Linguistics (London and New York: Routledge, 2002), pp. 209-252.








48. Penny Lee, ‘Metalinguistics: The Intercalibration of Agreement through Language Awareness’, in The Whorf Theory Complex: A Critical Reconstruction (Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1996), pp. 224-249.








49. James McElvenny, ‘The Application of C. K. Ogden’s Semiotics in Basic English’, Language Problems and Language Planning 39, 2, 2015, 187-204.








50. John E. Joseph, ‘The Origins of American Sociolinguistics’, in From Whitney to Chomsky: Essays in the History of American Linguistics (Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2002), pp. 107-131.








51. John E. Joseph and Frederick J. Newmeyer, ‘"All Languages Are Equally Complex": The Rise and Fall of a Consensus’, Historiographia Linguistica 39, 2-3, 2012, 341-368.








52. Frederick J. Newmeyer, Stephen R. Anderson, Sandra Chung and James McCloskey, ‘Chomsky’s 1962 Programme for Linguistics: A Retrospective’, in Generative Linguistics: A Historical Perspective London & New York: Routledge, 2002), pp. 66-79.








53. Gregory Radick, ‘The Unmaking of a Modern Synthesis: Noam Chomsky, Charles Hockett, and the Politics of Behaviorism, 1955-1965’, Isis 107, 2016, 49-73.








54. E. F. K. Koerner, ‘The Importance of Linguistic Historiography and the Place of History in Linguistic Science’, Foundations of Language 14, 4, 1976, 541-547.








55. David Cram, ‘Shelf Life and Time Horizons in the Historiography of Linguistics’, Historiographia Linguistica 34, 2-3, 2007, 189-212.








56. Els Elffers-van Ketel, ‘Metamethodology’, in The Historiography of Grammatical Concepts: 19th and 20th-century Changes in the Subject-Predicate Conception and the Problem of Their Historical Reconstruction (Amsterdam and Atlanta, Ga.: Rodopi, 1991), pp. 9-26.








57. John E. Joseph, ‘Corpse Puppetry: Anachronisms of Consistency, Continuity and Progress in the History of Linguistics’, History and Philosophy of the Language Sciences, 2015, http://hiphilangsci.net/2015/06/03/salon-anachronism-in-linguistic-historiography/
    Több