Money, Politics, and the First Amendment
Fifty Years of Supreme Court Decisions and Campaign Finance Reforms
-
10% KEDVEZMÉNY?
- A kedvezmény csak az 'Értesítés a kedvenc témákról' hírlevelünk címzettjeinek rendeléseire érvényes.
- Kiadói listaár GBP 19.99
-
9 550 Ft (9 095 Ft + 5% áfa)
Az ár azért becsült, mert a rendelés pillanatában nem lehet pontosan tudni, hogy a beérkezéskor milyen lesz a forint árfolyama az adott termék eredeti devizájához képest. Ha a forint romlana, kissé többet, ha javulna, kissé kevesebbet kell majd fizetnie.
- Kedvezmény(ek) 10% (cc. 955 Ft off)
- Kedvezményes ár 8 595 Ft (8 186 Ft + 5% áfa)
Iratkozzon fel most és részesüljön kedvezőbb árainkból!
Feliratkozom
9 550 Ft
Beszerezhetőség
Még nem jelent meg, de rendelhető. A megjelenéstől számított néhány héten belül megérkezik.
Why don't you give exact delivery time?
A beszerzés időigényét az eddigi tapasztalatokra alapozva adjuk meg. Azért becsült, mert a terméket külföldről hozzuk be, így a kiadó kiszolgálásának pillanatnyi gyorsaságától is függ. A megadottnál gyorsabb és lassabb szállítás is elképzelhető, de mindent megteszünk, hogy Ön a lehető leghamarabb jusson hozzá a termékhez.
A termék adatai:
- Kiadó OUP USA
- Megjelenés dátuma 2026. március 20.
- ISBN 9780197821916
- Kötéstípus Puhakötés
- Terjedelem440 oldal
- Méret 235x156 mm
- Nyelv angol 0
Kategóriák
Rövid leírás:
2026 will be the fiftieth anniversary of the landmark Buckley v. Valeo Supreme Court decision that
fundamentally reshaped the role of money in politics in the US. In that decision, the Court ruled that
restrictions on candidate campaign spending were violations of the First Amendment. In Money, Politics, and the First Amendment, Lee Bollinger and Geoffrey Stone have gathered a cast of eminent professors, judges, and politicians, including Senators Amy Klobuchar and Sheldon Whitehouse, to analyze the initial decision and its long aftermath in the fullest scope possible.
Hosszú leírás:
Money in political campaigns is a subject of endless current interest and enormous consequence for American democracy. Beginning in 1976, in Buckley v. Valeo, the Supreme Court established a framework for public campaign regulation that declared that money constitutes "speech" and that the only constitutional basis upon which the government can regulate money was to prohibit corruption or the appearance of corruption. The Court then defined corruption narrowly and held that direct "contributions" to candidates could be limited on that basis but that "expenditures," by political candidates and others, could not. Over time as the role of money became more and more serious in politics the Court in a number of decisions seemed to be turning more willing to accept regulation. But in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the new conservative Supreme Court sharply turned against permitting regulation, including of corporations.
Today that regime of nearly full protection for anyone spending virtually any amount of money for or against candidates and issues remains securely in place. The question, after a half century of this system, is whether this interpretation of the First Amendment is sound or not. If yes, then what are the justifications and what will be the consequences? If not, then what are alternative interpretations and what would the world be like under each one? The contributors, all scholars and experts in this area, give their interpretations and proposals.
Tartalomjegyzék:
Opening Dialogue
Part I. Introduction to the Supreme Court: Decisions on Campaign Finance Regulation
Buckley v. Valeo's Dubious yet Durable Contribution-Expenditure Distinction
How Buckley v. Valeo Led Us Astray
Part II. Critiques and a Defense of the Major Decisions
Getting It Wrong: The Supreme Court and Campaign Finance
Citizens United: Cracks in the Façade
A Defense of Buckley v. Valeoand Citizens United v. FEC
Part III. Campaign Finance and Race
Race and Campaign Finance Deregulation
Part IV. Recommendations for Legislation on Campaign Finance Reform
Money Talks, Dark Money Whispers: How Anonymous, Unlimited Political Spending Is Corrupting American Democracy
Elections in the Age of A.I.
Part V. Arguments Interpreting The "Corruption" Rationale
Corruption, Campaign Finance, and Criminal Law: Buckley's Legacy
Campaign Finance and "Real" Corruption
Buckley at 50: By What Right?
Part VI. The Effect of Campaign Finance: On Political Institutions
Buckley v. Valeo: Doctrinal Difficulties and Institutional Failure
Campaign Finance and Political Polarization
Party Campaign Finance: From FECA To Modern Hyperpartisanship
Plutocratic Democracy, Elon Musk, and the Limits of Campaign Finance Reform
Part VII. The Relationship Between Campaign Finance and the State of American Democracy
A Political Question?: Partisan Gerrymandering, Campaign Finance Regulation, and the Supreme Court
Without Buckley, Would American Democracy Really Be All That Different?
Campaign Finance and Contemporary Political Dysfunction
Part VIII. A Comparative Approach to Campaign Finance
Leveling The Playing Field: Insights from Comparative Constitutional Law
Closing Statement
Other Books by Bollinger & Stone
Cognitive Psychology: A Student's Handbook
21 493 Ft
19 344 Ft
The Organon, or Logical Treatises, of Aristotle: With the Introduction of Porphyry. Literally Translated, with Notes, Syllogistic Examples, Analysis,
10 534 Ft
9 692 Ft
Messias Puer: Christian Knorr von Rosenroth’s Lost Exegesis of Kabbalistic Christianity: Editio princeps plena with Translation and Introduction
109 494 Ft
100 734 Ft
Textile Conservation: Advances in Practice
62 107 Ft
55 897 Ft
