The Court of Justice of the European Union
Subsidiarity and Proportionality
Sorozatcím: Nijhoff Studies in European Union Law; 13;
-
8% KEDVEZMÉNY?
- A kedvezmény csak az 'Értesítés a kedvenc témákról' hírlevelünk címzettjeinek rendeléseire érvényes.
- Kiadói listaár EUR 173.00
-
71 751 Ft (68 335 Ft + 5% áfa)
Az ár azért becsült, mert a rendelés pillanatában nem lehet pontosan tudni, hogy a beérkezéskor milyen lesz a forint árfolyama az adott termék eredeti devizájához képest. Ha a forint romlana, kissé többet, ha javulna, kissé kevesebbet kell majd fizetnie.
- Kedvezmény(ek) 8% (cc. 5 740 Ft off)
- Kedvezményes ár 66 012 Ft (62 868 Ft + 5% áfa)
Iratkozzon fel most és részesüljön kedvezőbb árainkból!
Feliratkozom
71 751 Ft
Beszerezhetőség
Bizonytalan a beszerezhetőség. Érdemes még egyszer keresni szerzővel és címmel. Ha nem talál másik, kapható kiadást, forduljon ügyfélszolgálatunkhoz!
Why don't you give exact delivery time?
A beszerzés időigényét az eddigi tapasztalatokra alapozva adjuk meg. Azért becsült, mert a terméket külföldről hozzuk be, így a kiadó kiszolgálásának pillanatnyi gyorsaságától is függ. A megadottnál gyorsabb és lassabb szállítás is elképzelhető, de mindent megteszünk, hogy Ön a lehető leghamarabb jusson hozzá a termékhez.
A termék adatai:
- Kiadó Brill | Nijhoff
- Megjelenés dátuma 2018. március 22.
- ISBN 9789004344280
- Kötéstípus Keménykötés
- Terjedelem344 oldal
- Méret 235x155 mm
- Súly 1 g
- Nyelv angol 0
Kategóriák
Rövid leírás:
In the Court of Justice of the European Union, Subsidiarity and Proportionality Kate Shaw sets out how a subsidiarity and proportionality review applied to competences could be anchored by the Court of Justice in areas of shared competence.
TöbbHosszú leírás:
In the Court of Justice of the European Union, Subsidiarity and Proportionality Kate Shaw sets out how a subsidiarity and proportionality review applied to competences could be anchored by the Court of Justice when balancing the competing interests in cases concerning the residency rights of EU citizens. The book also considers the extent to which a court which is dedicated to enhancing the European project is really able to be an independent arbiter between the EU and the Member States in this context. Both the legal reasoning of the Court and the controversial nature of residency rights of EU citizens are legally and politically very topical at the moment and of interest to legal academics and law students.
TöbbTartalomjegyzék:
1 Introduction
1 Introduction and Overview
2 Competence, Conferral and the Principle of Subsidiarity
3 Anchoring Subsidiarity and the
4 Case Selection
5 Conclusion
2 Subsidiarity and Proportionality and the Balance of Power between the
1 Introduction
2 Subsidiarity as a Legal Principle and Rule
2.1 The Adoption of Subsidiarity as a Legal and Constitutional Principle by the
3 Proportionality as a Widely Recognised Concept Used as a Test in Judicial Review
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Proportionality as a Widely Recognised Concept Used as a Test in Judicial Review
3.3 Differing Interpretations of the Operationalization of Proportionality
3.4 Differing Levels of Intensity of Judicial Review by the
4 Subsidiarity and Proportionality in
-making in Shared Areas of Competence
4.1 A Conceptual Link between Conferral, Subsidiarity and Proportionality
4.2 Subsidiarity Alongside Proportionality in
-making in Shared Areas of Competence
5
6 Subsidiarity and the Introduction of the Yellow Card Procedure Following the Treaty of Lisbon
7 Conclusion
3 Subsidiarity and Proportionality and the Role of the
1 Introduction
2 Introducing the
3 The Pro
-union Interpretative Tendency of the
4 Subsidiarity and Judicial Review by the
5 Operationalising Subsidiarity and Proportionality Applied to Competences as Tool of Judicial Review
6 Operationalising Subsidiarity in the Context of the Common Market
7 Engaging the
8 Conclusion
4 The
1 Introduction
2 Theoretical Perspectives: The Concept of Citizenship and Its Link to Political Identity
2.1 Introduction
2.2 The Concept of Citizenship and Its Link to Political Identity Which in an
2.3 The Limits of
2.4 The Problems of Differing Levels of Protection from Expulsion for Different Categories of
2.5 Conclusion
3 Directive 2004/38 and the Distinction between Economically Active and Non
-economically Active
3.1 Introduction
3.2 The Introduction of
3.3 The Strengthening of Residence Rights in Directive 2004/38
3.4 The
3.5 The Reaffirming and Strengthening of the Residence Rights Attaching to
4 The Failure of the
5 Conclusion
5 Subsidiarity and Proportionality Review by the
1 Introduction
2 The Shift in the Case Law of the
3 Operationalising a Subsidiarity and Proportionality Review
4 The
5 Conclusion
6 Conclusion
Appendices
Appendix 1 Table of Treaties, Instruments and Legislation
Appendix 2 Table of Cases
Bibliography
Index
Több
The Court of Justice of the European Union: Subsidiarity and Proportionality
71 751 Ft
66 012 Ft