Comparative Constitutional Reasoning by Jakab, András; Dyevre, Arthur; Itzcovich, Giulio;

10% KEDVEZMÉNY?
A kedvezmény csak az 'Értesítés a kedvenc témákról' hírlevelünk címzettjeinek rendeléseire érvényes.

Kiadói listaár GBP 123.00
Az ár azért becsült, mert a rendelés pillanatában nem lehet pontosan tudni, hogy a beérkezéskor milyen lesz a forint árfolyama az adott termék eredeti devizájához képest. Ha a forint romlana, kissé többet, ha javulna, kissé kevesebbet kell majd fizetnie.

58 763 Ft (55 965 Ft + 5% áfa)
Kedvezmény(ek) 10% (cc. 5 876 Ft off)
Kedvezményes ár 52 887 Ft (50 369 Ft + 5% áfa)

58 763 Ft

Beszerezhetőség

Becsült beszerzési idő: A Prosperónál jelenleg nincsen raktáron, de a kiadónál igen. Beszerzés kb. 3-5 hét..
A Prosperónál jelenleg nincsen raktáron.

A termék adatai:

Kiadó Cambridge University Press
Megjelenés dátuma 2017. április 27.

ISBN 9781107085589
Kötéstípus Keménykötés
Terjedelem704 oldal
Méret 236x158x50 mm
Súly 1380 g
Nyelv angol
Illusztrációk 19 b/w illus. 6 tables

Kategóriák

Jogtudomány általában, kézikönyvek Nemzetközi jog Közigazgatási és alkotmányjog További könyvek a jog területén

Rövid leírás:

A large-scale comparative work of leading cases examines judicial constitutional reasoning in eighteen different legal systems globally.

Több

Hosszú leírás:

To what extent is the language of judicial opinions responsive to the political and social context in which constitutional courts operate? Courts are reason-giving institutions, with argumentation playing a central role in constitutional adjudication. However, a cursory look at just a handful of constitutional systems suggests important differences in the practices of constitutional judges, whether in matters of form, style, or language. Focusing on independently-verified leading cases globally, a combination of qualitative and quantitative analysis offers the most comprehensive and systematic account of constitutional reasoning to date. This analysis is supported by the examination of eighteen legal systems around the world including the European Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Justice. Universally common aspects of constitutional reasoning are identified in this book, and contributors also examine whether common law countries differ to civil law countries in this respect.

'Despite substantial academic attention to the rise of judicial power, we know fairly little about how newly empowered courts interpret their constitutions and justify their decisions. This timely and impressive edited collection fills this gap by presenting qualitative and quantitative data from 18 courts and over 700 cases. The volume is a must-read for those interested in comparative constitutional interpretation.' Mila Versteeg, University of Virginia School of Law

Több

Tartalomjegyzék:

1. Introduction: comparing constitutional reasoning with quantitative and qualitative methods Andr&&&225;s Jakab, Arthur Dyevre and Giulio Itzcovic; 2. The High Court of Australia Cheryl Saunders and Adrienne Stone; 3. The Austrian Constitutional Court Konrad Lachmayer; 4. The Supreme Federal Court of Brazil Conrado H&&&252;bner Mendes; 5. The Supreme Court of Canada Hugo Cyr and Monica Popescu; 6. The Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic Zden&&&283;k K&&&252;hn; 7. The European Court of Human Rights Janneke Gerards; 8. The European Court of Justice Giulio Itzcovich; 9. The French Constitutional Council Arthur Dyevre; 10. German Federal Constitutional Court Michaela Hailbronner and Stefan Martini; 11. The Constitutional Court of Hungary Andr&&&225;s Jakab and Johanna Fr&&&246;hlich; 12. The Supreme Court of Ireland Eoin Carolan; 13. The Israeli Supreme Court Suzie Navot; 14. The Constitutional Court of Italy Tania Groppi and Irene Spigno; 15. The Constitutional Court of South Africa Christa Rautenbach and Lorens du Plessis; 16. The Spanish Constitutional Court Marian Ahumada Ruiz; 17. The Constitutional Court of Taiwan Wen-Chen Chang; 18. The Supreme Court (House of Lords) of the United Kingdom Tamas Gyorfi; 19. The Supreme Court of the United States Howard Schweber and Jennifer L. Brookhart; 20. Conclusion Andr&&&225;s Jakab, Arthur Dyevre and Giulio Itzcovich.

Több

Mostanában megtekintett