• Kapcsolat

  • Hírlevél

  • Rólunk

  • Szállítási lehetőségek

  • Prospero könyvpiaci podcast

  • Putting Courts Under Pressure: When Lawmakers Push Constitutional Boundaries

    Putting Courts Under Pressure by Schroeder, Philipp A.;

    When Lawmakers Push Constitutional Boundaries

    Sorozatcím: Comparative Politics;

      • 10% KEDVEZMÉNY?

      • A kedvezmény csak az 'Értesítés a kedvenc témákról' hírlevelünk címzettjeinek rendeléseire érvényes.
      • Kiadói listaár GBP 84.00
      • Az ár azért becsült, mert a rendelés pillanatában nem lehet pontosan tudni, hogy a beérkezéskor milyen lesz a forint árfolyama az adott termék eredeti devizájához képest. Ha a forint romlana, kissé többet, ha javulna, kissé kevesebbet kell majd fizetnie.

        40 131 Ft (38 220 Ft + 5% áfa)
      • Kedvezmény(ek) 10% (cc. 4 013 Ft off)
      • Kedvezményes ár 36 118 Ft (34 398 Ft + 5% áfa)

    40 131 Ft

    db

    Beszerezhetőség

    Becsült beszerzési idő: A Prosperónál jelenleg nincsen raktáron, de a kiadónál igen. Beszerzés kb. 3-5 hét..
    A Prosperónál jelenleg nincsen raktáron.

    Why don't you give exact delivery time?

    A beszerzés időigényét az eddigi tapasztalatokra alapozva adjuk meg. Azért becsült, mert a terméket külföldről hozzuk be, így a kiadó kiszolgálásának pillanatnyi gyorsaságától is függ. A megadottnál gyorsabb és lassabb szállítás is elképzelhető, de mindent megteszünk, hogy Ön a lehető leghamarabb jusson hozzá a termékhez.

    A termék adatai:

    • Kiadó OUP Oxford
    • Megjelenés dátuma 2025. augusztus 7.

    • ISBN 9780198953234
    • Kötéstípus Keménykötés
    • Terjedelem176 oldal
    • Méret 241x163x17 mm
    • Súly 417 g
    • Nyelv angol
    • 635

    Kategóriák

    Rövid leírás:

    Focusing on the German Federal Constitutional Court (GFCC), one of the most influential courts globally, the book examines how lawmakers repeatedly pressured the GFCC to loosen constitutional constraints on policies.

    Több

    Hosszú leírás:

    Our understanding of the interaction between courts and political branches in modern democracies is incomplete. Courts are traditionally seen as passive but moderating forces in politics, with lawmakers expected to avoid pursuing policies likely to fail constitutional review. This book argues, however, that such an expectation oversimplifies the dynamics at play. Instead, lawmakers often take constitutional risks in their policy choices and challenge courts' ability to enforce constitutional boundaries.

    Schroeder demonstrates how lawmakers deliberately push constitutional boundaries, signalling credible threats of non-compliance to courts, which respond by easing legal restrictions on lawmakers' policy-making. This perspective challenges the prevailing view that constitutional review deters legislative overreach. Through a formal theoretical model and robust empirical evidence, the book provides counterintuitive insights into when and why courts accommodate lawmakers who disregard constitutional concerns about their policy choices, even at significant political cost.

    Focusing on the German Federal Constitutional Court (GFCC), one of the most influential courts globally, the book examines how lawmakers repeatedly pressured the GFCC to loosen constitutional constraints on policies. Schroeder's analysis presents a normative quandary for democracies. While courts are tasked with protecting constitutional rights, their accommodation of political actors on high-stakes issues raises concerns about the erosion of constitutional norms. By integrating insights into legislative and judicial behaviour, the book provides a novel perspective on politics in systems of separation-of-powers, making it an essential read for scholars of judicial politics, legislative politics, and democratic governance.

    Comparative Politics is a series for researchers, teachers, and students of political science that deals with contemporary government and politics. Global in scope, books in the series are characterized by a stress on comparative analysis and strong methodological rigour. The series is published in association with the European Consortium for Political Research. For more information visit www.ecprnet.eu

    The series is edited by Nicole Bolleyer, Chair of Comparative Political Science, Geschwister Scholl Institute, LMU Munich, and Jonathan Slapin, Professor of Political Institutions and European Politics, University of Zurich.

    Több

    Tartalomjegyzék:

    List of Figures
    List of Tables
    The Sources and Implications of Constrained Constitutional Review
    When Lawmakers Push Constitutional Limits and Courts Back Down
    Methodology
    When Lawmakers Push Boundaries
    Judicial Responses: When Constitutional Courts Back Down
    Pushing Boundaries: The Case of State Surveillance in Germany
    Putting Courts under Pressure: Normative Repercussions
    Bibliography
    Index

    Több
    0