• Contact

  • Newsletter

  • About us

  • Delivery options

  • Prospero Book Market Podcast

  • 'Language is english. Váltás magyarra.'
    Wishlist
    The Sovereignty of Parliament: History and Philosophy

    The Sovereignty of Parliament by Goldsworthy, Jeffrey;

    History and Philosophy

      • GET 10% OFF

      • The discount is only available for 'Alert of Favourite Topics' newsletter recipients.
      • Publisher's listprice GBP 185.00
      • The price is estimated because at the time of ordering we do not know what conversion rates will apply to HUF / product currency when the book arrives. In case HUF is weaker, the price increases slightly, in case HUF is stronger, the price goes lower slightly.

        83 527 Ft (79 550 Ft + 5% VAT)
      • Discount 10% (cc. 8 353 Ft off)
      • Discounted price 75 175 Ft (71 595 Ft + 5% VAT)

    83 527 Ft

    db

    Availability

    printed on demand

    Why don't you give exact delivery time?

    Delivery time is estimated on our previous experiences. We give estimations only, because we order from outside Hungary, and the delivery time mainly depends on how quickly the publisher supplies the book. Faster or slower deliveries both happen, but we do our best to supply as quickly as possible.

    Product details:

    • Publisher Clarendon Press
    • Date of Publication 29 July 1999

    • ISBN 9780198268932
    • Binding Hardback
    • No. of pages330 pages
    • Size 242x163x22 mm
    • Weight 631 g
    • Language English
    • 0

    Categories

    Short description:

    In British constitutional law, the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty maintains that Parliament has unlimited legislative authority. Critics have recently challenged this doctrine, on historical and philosophical grounds. This book describes its historical origins and development. The author identifies the reasons why it was adopted, examines its current legal basis, and responds to the critics. The book will be of interest to anyone involved in the legal, historical, or philosophical foundations of the British Constitution.

    More

    Long description:

    The doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty has long been regarded as the most fundamental element of the British Constitution. It holds that Parliament has unlimited legislative authority, and that the courts have no authority to judge statutes invalid. This doctrine has now been criticized on historical and philosophical grounds and critics claim that it is a relatively recent invention of academic lawyers that superseded an earlier tradition in which Parliament's authority was limited to common law. The critics also argue that it is based on a misunderstanding of the relationship between statutory and common law, and is morally indefensible.

    The Sovereignty of Parliament: History and Philosophy responds to these criticisms. It first defines and clarifies the concept of legislative sovereignty and then describes the historical origins and the development of the doctrine from the thirteenth to the end of the nineteenth century. Professor Goldsworthy goes on to identify many different reasons why persuaded statesmen, lawyers, and political theorists have endorsed the doctrine. He discusses the ideas of a large number of legal and political thinkers, including Fortescue, St German, Hooker, Coke, Bacon, Parker, Milton, Hobbes, Hale, Locke, Bolingbroke, Blackstone, and Burke. He shows that judges in Great Britain have never had authority to invalidate statutes, and that the doctrine is much older than is generally realized.

    The book concludes by dealing with philosophical criticisms of the doctrine. Combining the insights of earlier thinkers with those of contemporary legal philosophers, it demonstrates that these criticisms are based on a defective understanding of the nature and foundations of law, and of the relationship between legislative authority and the common law. It argues that the doctrine is morally defensible, and refutes the thesis that the judges have authority to modify or reject it.

    Professor Goldsworthy has written an important and valuable book, and historians of English political thought will find in it a broad and thoroughly informed account of the development of ideas on parliamentary sovereignty.

    More

    Table of Contents:

    Introduction
    Defining Parliamentary Sovereignty
    A. Parliament and Sovereignty Defined
    B. Sovereignty and Higher Law
    From Bracton to the Reformation
    A. Medieval Kingship, Law and Politics
    B. Parliament and its Authority
    C. Parliament as a Law-maker
    D. Parliament and the Courts
    E. Parliament in Legal Theory
    F. Parliament and the Church
    The Sixteenth Century
    A. The Authority of Parliament Extended
    B. The Supremacy of Parliament Recognised
    C. Two Theories of the Authority of Parliament
    D. Royalist Theories
    E. Parliamentarian Theories
    F. Prelude to the Seventeenth Century
    From James I to the Restoration
    A. Political Theories in Early Stuart England
    B. Royalist Theories of the Authority of Parliament
    C. Parliamentarian Theories of the Authority of Parliament
    D. Common Law Theories of the Authority of Parliament
    E. Parliamentary Sovereignty Affirmed
    F. The Interregnum
    From the Restoration to the Revolution
    A. Monarchist Ideologies
    B. Whig Ideology
    After the Revolution
    A. Whig and Tory Consensus
    B. The Union of England and Scotland
    C. Legal Sovereignty, Popular Sovereignty, and the Right of Resistance
    D. Law-Making Power and Constitutional Principle
    E. British Opinion During the American Crisis
    F. Judicial Opinion and Legal Theory
    G. American Revolutionary Constitutional Theory
    H. The Reform Movement in Britain
    The Nineteenth Century
    Historical Conclusions
    The Philosophical Foundations of Parliamentary Sovereignty
    A. Parliamentary Sovereignty and Legal Philosophy
    B. Law as the Foundation of Law-making Authority
    C. The Common Law as the Foundation of Law-making Authority
    D. Legal Principles as the Foundation of Law-making Authority
    E. The Practice of British Officials
    F. Official Consensus as the Foundation of Law-making Authority
    G. The Argument From Extreme Cases
    H. Further Arguments
    I. The Alleged Necessity of Judicially Enforceable Constitutional Rights
    Bibliography

    More
    0