Sovereignty and Justice
Creating Domestic War Crimes Courts within the Principle of Complementarity
-
10% KEDVEZMÉNY?
- A kedvezmény csak az 'Értesítés a kedvenc témákról' hírlevelünk címzettjeinek rendeléseire érvényes.
- Kiadói listaár GBP 97.00
-
46 341 Ft (44 135 Ft + 5% áfa)
Az ár azért becsült, mert a rendelés pillanatában nem lehet pontosan tudni, hogy a beérkezéskor milyen lesz a forint árfolyama az adott termék eredeti devizájához képest. Ha a forint romlana, kissé többet, ha javulna, kissé kevesebbet kell majd fizetnie.
- Kedvezmény(ek) 10% (cc. 4 634 Ft off)
- Kedvezményes ár 41 708 Ft (39 722 Ft + 5% áfa)
Iratkozzon fel most és részesüljön kedvezőbb árainkból!
Feliratkozom
46 341 Ft
Beszerezhetőség
Megjelenése törölve vagy kivonva a forgalomból. Sajnos nem rendelhető.
Why don't you give exact delivery time?
A beszerzés időigényét az eddigi tapasztalatokra alapozva adjuk meg. Azért becsült, mert a terméket külföldről hozzuk be, így a kiadó kiszolgálásának pillanatnyi gyorsaságától is függ. A megadottnál gyorsabb és lassabb szállítás is elképzelhető, de mindent megteszünk, hogy Ön a lehető leghamarabb jusson hozzá a termékhez.
A termék adatai:
- Kiadó OUP USA
- Megjelenés dátuma 2015. január 1.
- ISBN 9780199856541
- Kötéstípus Keménykötés
- Terjedelem552 oldal
- Méret 235x156 mm
- Nyelv angol 0
Kategóriák
Rövid leírás:
In Sovereignty and Justice: Creating Domestic War Crimes Courts within the Principle of Complementarity, Mark Ellis explores the International Criminal Court's (ICC) principle of complementarity, providing an introduction to the jurisdictional tensions that arise between the international court and nations that desire to prosecute war criminals in their own courts.
TöbbHosszú leírás:
Since 1945, armed conflicts have taken the lives of approximately 100 million people, yet only 823 persons have been indicted by international and regional courts. A trend of heightened international justice, however, is growing, bolstered by the United Nations' 2002 establishment of the International Criminal Court (ICC). In Sovereignty and Justice: Creating Domestic War Crimes Courts within the Principle of Complementarity, Mark Ellis examines the law that establishes
the ICC - the Rome Statute - and its principle of complementarity. The principle represents the idea that ICC jurisdiction should merely complement the exercise of domestic court jurisdiction, and that the ICC can exercise jurisdiction only when a State is unwilling or unable to so. Ellis asserts that this
principle is the key foundation for domestic jurisdiction over international crimes and is the stimulus behind the growing number of domestic war crimes courts.
Ellis demonstrates the shifting trend toward domestic war crimes courts and discusses how to best implement an effective partnership between these rising courts and the international legal community. In doing so, Ellis provides informative description and comparison of the existing international criminal courts and tribunals, domestic war crimes courts, and the laws by which they are governed. He discusses the importance of the implementation of international standards of justice within the
domestic courts in regards to the principle of complementarity, and he addresses three key areas that affect domestic courts' credibility and sustainability: 1) fair trial standards for defendants, 2) an effective system of support and protection to witnesses and victims, and 3) the selection of judges
that are both qualified and impartial. Analyzing the standing of these fundamental principles in current courts, Ellis offers legal guidance on how domestic courts can strengthen their laws in these areas and thereby ensure their jurisdictional sovereignty.
Tartalomjegyzék:
Acknowledgments
Introduction
Ch. 1 The Principle of Complementarity
Ch. 2 Ensuring Effective Defense in Domestic War Crimes Courts
Ch. 3 Ensuring Effective Witness Protection in Domestic War Crimes Courts
Ch. 4 The Selection of Judges for Domestic War Crimes Tribunals
Ch. 5 Domestic Political Challenges in Bringing about Accountability
Ch. 6 International Financial and Professional Support for Domestic Tribunals
Conclusion
Bibliography