• Kapcsolat

  • Hírlevél

  • Rólunk

  • Szállítási lehetőségek

  • Prospero könyvpiaci podcast

  • 'Magyar nyelvű oldal. Change to english.'
    Kívánságlista
    Selecting Europe's Judges: A Critical Review of the Appointment Procedures to the European Courts

    Selecting Europe's Judges by Bobek, Michal;

    A Critical Review of the Appointment Procedures to the European Courts

      • 10% KEDVEZMÉNY?

      • A kedvezmény csak az 'Értesítés a kedvenc témákról' hírlevelünk címzettjeinek rendeléseire érvényes.
      • Kiadói listaár GBP 122.50
      • Az ár azért becsült, mert a rendelés pillanatában nem lehet pontosan tudni, hogy a beérkezéskor milyen lesz a forint árfolyama az adott termék eredeti devizájához képest. Ha a forint romlana, kissé többet, ha javulna, kissé kevesebbet kell majd fizetnie.

        55 308 Ft (52 675 Ft + 5% áfa)
      • Kedvezmény(ek) 10% (cc. 5 531 Ft off)
      • Kedvezményes ár 49 778 Ft (47 408 Ft + 5% áfa)

    55 308 Ft

    db

    Beszerezhetőség

    Megrendelésre a kiadó utánnyomja a könyvet. Rendelhető, de a szokásosnál kicsit lassabban érkezik meg.

    Why don't you give exact delivery time?

    A beszerzés időigényét az eddigi tapasztalatokra alapozva adjuk meg. Azért becsült, mert a terméket külföldről hozzuk be, így a kiadó kiszolgálásának pillanatnyi gyorsaságától is függ. A megadottnál gyorsabb és lassabb szállítás is elképzelhető, de mindent megteszünk, hogy Ön a lehető leghamarabb jusson hozzá a termékhez.

    A termék adatai:

    • Kiadó OUP Oxford
    • Megjelenés dátuma 2015. március 19.

    • ISBN 9780198727781
    • Kötéstípus Keménykötés
    • Terjedelem336 oldal
    • Méret 240x162x26 mm
    • Súly 648 g
    • Nyelv angol
    • 0

    Kategóriák

    Rövid leírás:

    Against the backdrop of the recent changes in the selection mechanisms to the Court of Justice of the EU and the European Court of Human Rights, this book provides not only unique insights into how the new systems operate, but also their critical and comparative evaluation.

    Több

    Hosszú leírás:

    The past decade has witnessed change in the ways judges for the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights are selected. The leitmotif has been securing greater professional quality of the judicial candidates, and, for this purpose, both European systems have put in place various advisory panels or selection committees that are called to evaluate the aptitude of the candidates put forward by the national governments. Are these institutional reforms successful in guaranteeing greater quality of the judicial candidates? Do they increase the legitimacy of the European courts? Has the creation of these advisory panels in any way altered the institutional balance, either horizontally within the international organisations, or vertically, between the respective organisation and its Member States? Above all, has the spree of 'judicial comitology' as currently practised a good way for selecting Europe's judges?

    These and a number of other questions are addressed in this topical volume in a comparative and interdisciplinary prospective. The book is structured into two elements: first, how the operation of the new selection mechanisms is captured and analyzed from different vantage points, and secondly, having mapped the ground, the book critically and comparatively engages with selected common themes, examining the new mechanisms with respect to values and principles such as democracy, judicial independence, transparency, representativeness, and legitimacy.

    Több

    Tartalomjegyzék:

    The Changing Nature of Selection Procedures to the European Courts
    Not Quite the Bed that Procrustes Built: Dissecting the System for Selecting Judges at the Court of Justice of the European Union
    Judicial Performance, Membership, and Design at the Court of Justice
    Selecting European Union's Judges: The Practice of the Article 255 Panel
    The Real Test - How to Contribute to a Better Justice: The Experience of the Civil Service Tribunal
    (S)electing Judges for Strasbourg: A (Dis)appointing Process?
    Selecting Strasbourg Judges: A Critique
    On the Democratic Legitimacy of Europe's Judges: A Principled and Comparative Reconstruction of the Selection Procedures
    Can Judicial Selection Secure Judicial Independence? Constraining State Governments in Selecting International Judges
    How Transparent is Transparent Enough? Balancing Access to Information versus Privacy in European Judicial Selections
    Spillovers in Selecting Europe's Judges: Will the Criterion of Gender Equality Make it to Luxembourg?
    Selection, Appointment, and Legitimacy: A Political Perspective
    The Legitimization Strategies of European Courts: The Case of the European Court of Human Rights
    Finding the European Hercules

    Több
    0