Inclusive Legal Positivism by Waluchow, W. J.;

10% KEDVEZMÉNY?
A kedvezmény csak az 'Értesítés a kedvenc témákról' hírlevelünk címzettjeinek rendeléseire érvényes.

Kiadói listaár GBP 190.00
Az ár azért becsült, mert a rendelés pillanatában nem lehet pontosan tudni, hogy a beérkezéskor milyen lesz a forint árfolyama az adott termék eredeti devizájához képest. Ha a forint romlana, kissé többet, ha javulna, kissé kevesebbet kell majd fizetnie.

90 772 Ft (86 450 Ft + 5% áfa)
Kedvezmény(ek) 10% (cc. 9 077 Ft off)
Kedvezményes ár 81 695 Ft (77 805 Ft + 5% áfa)

90 772 Ft

Beszerezhetőség

Megrendelésre a kiadó utánnyomja a könyvet. Rendelhető, de a szokásosnál kicsit lassabban érkezik meg.

A termék adatai:

Kiadó Clarendon Press
Megjelenés dátuma 1994. április 14.

ISBN 9780198258124
Kötéstípus Keménykötés
Terjedelem300 oldal
Méret 223x144x23 mm
Súly 510 g
Nyelv angol

Kategóriák

Etika Irodalomelmélet Jogtudomány általában, kézikönyvek

Rövid leírás:

This book develops a general, philosophical theory about the nature of law and its relationship with morality. Its central theoretical question is whether, in determining the extent of our legal rights and obligations, judges must appeal to moral principles and values. The author argues that they often do, and develops a philosophical theory which accomodates this fact.

Több

Hosszú leírás:

This book develops a general theory of law – inclusive legal positivism – which seeks to remain within the tradition represented by authors such as Austin, Hart, MacCormick, and Raz, while sharing some of the virtues of both classical and modern theories of natural law, as represented by authors such as Aquinas, Fuller, Finnis, and Dworkin. W. J. Walchow articulates and defends his own version of legal positivism, which is a refinement and development of the views of H. L. A. Hart. The author shows how inclusive legal positivism demonstrates that the existence or content of positive law does depend on moral considerations; and that this is consistent with legal positivism.

In addition, Waluchow helps to remove the confusion which has marred current jurisprudential debates about the nature of law. He argues that these debates are often clouded by failures to appreciate that different theorists are offering different kinds of theories and attempting to answer different questions. He also accuses theorists, principally Ronald Dworkin, of failing to characterize opposing theories correctly.

much of Waluchow's book ably defends inclusive positivism ... Anyone wishing to see a well-argued defense of a legal theory that attempts to take legal phenomena at face value would do well to read Waluchow's book.