Cases Without Controversies
Uncontested Adjudication in Article III Courts
-
20% KEDVEZMÉNY?
- A kedvezmény csak az 'Értesítés a kedvenc témákról' hírlevelünk címzettjeinek rendeléseire érvényes.
- Kiadói listaár GBP 105.00
-
47 407 Ft (45 150 Ft + 5% áfa)
Az ár azért becsült, mert a rendelés pillanatában nem lehet pontosan tudni, hogy a beérkezéskor milyen lesz a forint árfolyama az adott termék eredeti devizájához képest. Ha a forint romlana, kissé többet, ha javulna, kissé kevesebbet kell majd fizetnie.
- Kedvezmény(ek) 20% (cc. 9 481 Ft off)
- Kedvezményes ár 37 926 Ft (36 120 Ft + 5% áfa)
- A kedvezmény érvényes eddig: 2026. június 30.
Iratkozzon fel most és részesüljön kedvezőbb árainkból!
Feliratkozom
47 407 Ft
Beszerezhetőség
Becsült beszerzési idő: A Prosperónál jelenleg nincsen raktáron, de a kiadónál igen. Beszerzés kb. 3-5 hét..
A Prosperónál jelenleg nincsen raktáron.
Why don't you give exact delivery time?
A beszerzés időigényét az eddigi tapasztalatokra alapozva adjuk meg. Azért becsült, mert a terméket külföldről hozzuk be, így a kiadó kiszolgálásának pillanatnyi gyorsaságától is függ. A megadottnál gyorsabb és lassabb szállítás is elképzelhető, de mindent megteszünk, hogy Ön a lehető leghamarabb jusson hozzá a termékhez.
A termék adatai:
- Kiadó OUP USA
- Megjelenés dátuma 2021. szeptember 21.
- ISBN 9780197571408
- Kötéstípus Keménykötés
- Terjedelem280 oldal
- Méret 155x236x22 mm
- Súly 612 g
- Nyelv angol 139
Kategóriák
Rövid leírás:
As it interprets the U.S. Constitution, the Supreme Court defines the rights of individuals and referees disputes between the branches of government. For many years, the Court has limited access to those claimants who satisfy a shifting and sometimes amorphous case-or-controversy requirement. Drawing on historical practice to clarify the meaning of the constitutional terms in question, this book calls upon the Court to offer broader access to federal court and greater deference to congressional choices.
TöbbHosszú leírás:
This book offers a new account of the power of federal courts in the United States to hear and determine uncontested applications to assert or register a claim of right. Familiar to lawyers in civil law countries as forms of voluntary or non-contentious jurisdiction, these uncontested applications fit uneasily with the commitment to adversary legalism in the United States. Indeed, modern accounts of federal judicial power often urge that the language of the Article III of the U.S. Constitution limits federal courts to the adjudication of concrete disputes between adverse parties, thereby ruling out all forms of non-contentious jurisdiction. Said to rest on the so-called “case-or-controversy” requirement of Article III, this requirement of party contestation threatens the power of federal courts to conduct a range of familiar proceedings, such as the oversight of bankruptcy proceedings, the issuance of warrants, and the adjudication of applications for mandamus and habeas corpus relief. By recounting the tradition of naturalization and other uncontested litigation in antebellum America and coupling that tradition with an account of the important difference between cases and controversies, this book challenges the prevailing understanding of Article III. In addition to defending the power of federal courts to hear uncontested matters of federal law, the book examines the way the Constitution's meaning has changed over time and suggests a constructive interpretive methodology that would allow the Supreme Court to take account of the old and the new in defining the contours of federal judicial power.
Overall, Jim Pfander's book is legal history at its finest. He has done thorough research, drawn reasonable conclusions from the primary sources, fairly acknowledged possible competing interpretations, and explained complex legal and historical ideas clearly. No one has a better understanding of the historical meaning of Article III.
Tartalomjegyzék:
Foreword
Introduction
Part One: Thesis: Uncontested Adjudication in the Federal Courts
1. Chapter One: The Origins of Uncontested Adjudication
2. Chapter Two: Uncontested Proceedings on Federal Dockets in the Early Republic
3. Chapter Three: Probate and Domestic Relations Proceedings
4. Chapter Four: The Nineteenth-Century Perspective on Federal Judicial Power
Part Two: Antithesis: The Progressive Restatement of an Emerging Case-or-Controversy Requirement
5. Chapter Five: The Judicial Response to the Administrative State
6. Chapter Six: The Progressive Response to Lochner: Limiting Justiciability
7. Chapter Seven: The New Adverse-Party Rule Confronts Judicial Practice
Part Three: Synthesis: Cases, Controversies, and Litigable Interests
8. Chapter Eight: Uncontested Adjudication and the Modern Case-or-Controversy Rule
9. Chapter Nine: Evaluating Defenses of a Requirement of Adverse Interests
10. Chapter Ten: Uncontested Adjudication and Standing to Sue
11. Chapter Eleven: A Practical Guide to Uncontested Adjudication
12. Chapter Twelve: Toward a Constructive Constitutional History
Part Four: Conclusion
