Medical Law-Making and the Role of the Scientific Expert
The Case of ART in Comparative Perspective
Series: Biomedical Law and Ethics Library;
- Publisher's listprice GBP 90.00
-
42 997 Ft (40 950 Ft + 5% VAT)
The price is estimated because at the time of ordering we do not know what conversion rates will apply to HUF / product currency when the book arrives. In case HUF is weaker, the price increases slightly, in case HUF is stronger, the price goes lower slightly.
- Discount 10% (cc. 4 300 Ft off)
- Discounted price 38 698 Ft (36 855 Ft + 5% VAT)
Subcribe now and take benefit of a favourable price.
Subscribe
42 997 Ft
Availability
Not yet published.
Why don't you give exact delivery time?
Delivery time is estimated on our previous experiences. We give estimations only, because we order from outside Hungary, and the delivery time mainly depends on how quickly the publisher supplies the book. Faster or slower deliveries both happen, but we do our best to supply as quickly as possible.
Product details:
- Edition number 1
- Publisher Routledge
- Date of Publication 30 October 2030
- ISBN 9781138675438
- Binding Hardback
- No. of pages256 pages
- Size 234x156 mm
- Language English 0
Categories
Short description:
As medical applications and scientific knowledge rapidly evolves, it is a challenge for statutory law to keep up and adapt. Law-making bodies are faced with the dilemma of whether to regulate new medical procedures. This book explores nature and function of Parliamentary regulation in the biomedical field, particularly focusing on the role of scientific expertise in both law-making and law-enforcing processes. Taking assisted reproductive technologies (ART) as a key case, and drawing on the legal systems of the UK, France, Italy and Spain, the book adopts a comparative method to understand the nature of medical regulation in both civil and common law systems.
MoreLong description:
As medical applications and scientific knowledge rapidly evolves, it is a challenge for statutory law to keep up and adapt. Law-making bodies are faced with the dilemma of whether to regulate new medical procedures. This book explores nature and function of Parliamentary regulation in the biomedical field, particularly focusing on the role of scientific expertise in both law-making and law-enforcing processes.
Taking assisted reproductive technologies (ART) as a key case, and drawing on the legal systems of the UK, France, Italy and Spain, the book adopts a comparative method to understand the nature of medical regulation in both civil and common law systems. Simon Penasa argues that a shift of paradigm is needed to understanding how statutory law may adequately guarantee an adaptable regulation in a field characterised by fluidity and swift change.
As a book that compares the regulation of assisted reproduction, and the more generally process of medical law-making, this book will be a value resource to students and researchers of bioethics, medical/health law, and medicine.
MoreTable of Contents:
Introduction: Reasons for a comparative study on ART regulation: A trend towards a common approach to the regulation of science? 1. Comparative method and the biomedical framework: ART regulation 2. New routes for classifying ART regulation: From legislative content to legislative method. 3. The implementation of indicators: The growth of transversal regulatory models 4. The implementation of indicators: substantive law 5. Convergence by procedures: the integration by specialisation of different regulatory tools
More
Maria Merian's Butterflies Coloring Book: Drawings from the Royal Collection
4 569 HUF
4 203 HUF
Medical Law-Making and the Role of the Scientific Expert: The Case of ART in Comparative Perspective
