• Contact

  • Newsletter

  • About us

  • Delivery options

  • Prospero Book Market Podcast

  • Law and Practices of Delegated Rulemaking by the European Commission

    Law and Practices of Delegated Rulemaking by the European Commission by Xhaferri, Zamira;

    Series: Nijhoff Studies in European Union Law; 22;

      • GET 8% OFF

      • The discount is only available for 'Alert of Favourite Topics' newsletter recipients.
      • Publisher's listprice EUR 191.00
      • The price is estimated because at the time of ordering we do not know what conversion rates will apply to HUF / product currency when the book arrives. In case HUF is weaker, the price increases slightly, in case HUF is stronger, the price goes lower slightly.

        79 217 Ft (75 445 Ft + 5% VAT)
      • Discount 8% (cc. 6 337 Ft off)
      • Discounted price 72 880 Ft (69 409 Ft + 5% VAT)

    79 217 Ft

    Availability

    Uncertain availability. Please turn to our customer service.

    Why don't you give exact delivery time?

    Delivery time is estimated on our previous experiences. We give estimations only, because we order from outside Hungary, and the delivery time mainly depends on how quickly the publisher supplies the book. Faster or slower deliveries both happen, but we do our best to supply as quickly as possible.

    Product details:

    • Publisher Brill | Nijhoff
    • Date of Publication 11 January 2023

    • ISBN 9789004509870
    • Binding Hardback
    • No. of pages368 pages
    • Size 235x155 mm
    • Weight 765 g
    • Language English
    • 0

    Categories

    Short description:

    This book first provides a critical analysis of the legal framework that governs the delegation of rulemaking powers to the European Commission. Second, it explores how the framework that governs such a delegation of powers to the Commission operates in the food and health policy domain.

    More

    Long description:

    This book examines the law and practice of the delegation of rulemaking powers to the European Commission. It combines legal doctrine with empirical research methods to bridge the gap between “law on the books” and “law in action” to fully appreciate the meaning and the impact of the changes post-Lisbon. The results of the empirical case study provide food for thought on how the current legal framework regime for delegated rulemaking by the European Commission could be improved. The findings seek to contribute to the academic and policy debates on this research topic that is likely to continue in forthcoming years.

    More

    Table of Contents:

    Acknowledgments


    List of Tables


    Abbreviations


    1Introduction

     1 Context


     2 Setting the Scene

     2.1 Delegation of Rulemaking Powers to the European Commission Before Lisbon


     2.2 The Changes Introduced by the Lisbon Treaty




     3 Research Questions


     4 Research Method


     5 Research Delimitations


     6 Research Structure




    2Delegated Rulemaking by the European Commission from Rome to Lisbon

     1 Introduction


     2 Delegation of Rulemaking Powers to the European Commission

     2.1 The Scope and Limits for Delegation


     2.2 The Legal Conditions for Delegation




     3 The Birth and the Development of Comitology

     3.1 The First Comitology Decision Following the Single European Act


     3.2 The Maastricht Treaty and the Modus Vivendi


     3.3 The Second Comitology Decision


     3.4 The Background to the Third Comitology Decision

     3.4.1 The Lamfalussy Arrangements


     3.4.2 The White Paper on European Governance


     3.4.3 The Constitution for Europe




     3.5 The Third Comitology Decision




     4 Conclusion




    3Delegated Rulemaking by the European Commission Post
    -Lisbon


     1 Introduction


     2 The Law
    -Making within the Union

     2.1 Legislative Acts


     2.2 Non
    -legislative Acts


     2.2.1 Delegated Acts

     2.2.1.1 Limits for Delegation


     2.2.1.2 Conditions for Delegation


     2.2.1.3 Expert Groups




     2.2.2 Implementing Acts

     2.2.2.1 The Comitology Regulation


     2.2.2.2 The rps Alignment Post
    -Lisbon



     2.2.2.3 Amending the Comitology Regulation





     3 The Choice of Delegated Acts and Implementing Acts in EU law

     3.1 The Academic Debate


     3.2 The Institutional Debate


     3.3 The Established Jurisprudence




     4 Conclusion




    4Delegated Rulemaking by the European Commission in Practice

     1 Introduction


     2 Empirical Data in EU law

     2.1 Overview of rps Measures, Implementing and Delegated Acts


     2.2 Overview of Objections to rps Measures, Implementing and Delegated Acts by the Council


     2.3 Overview of Objections of Delegated Acts by the European Parliament




     3 Discussion


     4 The Choice of Legislative Acts, Delegated and Implementing Acts in Food and Health Matters

     4.1 Regulation On the Provision of Food Information to Consumers in the EU

     4.1.1 Context


     4.1.2 Positions of the Union Institutions

     4.1.2.1 The List of Mandatory Food Information


     4.1.2.2 Availability and Placement of Mandatory Food Information


     4.1.2.3 Presentation of Mandatory Food Information


     4.1.2.4 Instructions for the Use of a Food


     4.1.2.5 Labelling of the Nutrition Declaration of a Food


     4.1.2.6 Assessment




     4.2 Regulation on Foods Intended for Vulnerable Consumers in the EU

     4.2.1 Context


     4.2.2 Positions of the Union Institutions

     4.2.2.1 Establishment and Update a Union List of Food Substances


     4.2.2.2 Amendments of Food Definitions


     4.2.2.3 Assessment




     4.3 Regulation for the Non
    -commercial Movement of Pet Animals from Non
    -EU Countries


     4.3.1 General Context


     4.3.2 Positions of the Union Institutions

     4.3.2.1 Establishment of a Union List of Territories and Third Countries


     4.3.2.2 Conditions to Authorise the Non
    -commercial Movement of Pets from Non
    -EU Countries into and within the Union



     4.3.2.3 Assessment




     4.4 Animal Health Law

     4.4.1 Context


     4.4.2 Positions of the Union Institutions

     4.4.2.1 Listed Animal Diseases, Emerging Diseases, Species, and Categorisation of Listed Diseases


     4.4.2.2 Eradication Programmes for Animal Diseases


     4.4.2.3 Identification and Registration of Kept Terrestrial Animals


     4.4.2.4 Union Disease Notifications


     4.4.2.5 Assessment




     4.5 Directive for the Approximation of National Laws on the Manufacture, Presentation, and Sale of Tobacco Products in the EU

     4.5.1 Context


     4.5.2 Positions of the Union Institutions

     4.5.2.1 Maximum Emission Levels from Cigarettes


     4.5.2.2 Measurement Methods


     4.5.2.3 Regulation of Ingredients and Emissions


     4.5.2.4 General Warnings on Tobacco Products for Smoking


     4.5.2.5 Combined Health Warnings for Tobacco Products for Smoking


     4.5.2.6 Labelling of Tobacco for Smoking Other than Cigarettes, Roll
    -Your
    -Own Tobacco and Waterpipe Tobacco



     4.5.2.7 Appearance of Unit Packets


     4.5.2.8 Traceability and Security Features


     4.5.2.9 Nicotine
    -Containing Products





     4.5.3 Assessment




     4.6 Directive on the Application of Patients’ Rights in Cross
    -Border Healthcare in the EU


     4.6.1 Context


     4.6.2 Positions of the Union Institutions

     4.6.2.1 Hospital and Specialised Care


     4.6.2.2 Recognition of Medical Prescriptions, e
    -Health, Cooperation on Health Technology Assessment



     4.6.2.3 European Reference Networks


     4.6.2.4 Assessment





     5 The Oversight of Delegated Rulemaking in Food and Health Matters

     5.1 Empirical Data

     5.1.1 Overview of rps Measures, Delegated and Implementing Acts


     5.1.2 Oversight of rps Measures, Delegated and Implementing Acts by the European and the Council of the EU


     5.1.3 Early Non
    -objections and Extensions of Deadlines for Delegated Acts by the European Parliament




     5.2 The Practice of Oversight of Delegated and Implementing Acts

     5.2.1 Oversight by the Council of the EU


     5.2.2 Oversight by the European Parliament

     5.2.2.1 Engineered Nanomaterials for Food Labelling


     5.2.2.2 Composition and Labelling Requirements for Processed Cereal
    -Based Food and Baby Food



     5.2.2.3 Labelling the Country of Origin or Place of Provenance for Meats





     6 Discussion and Conclusion




    5Conclusions

     1 Introduction


     2 Legislation and Delegation to the European Commission Pre
    -Lisbon


     3 Legislation and Delegation to the European Commission Post
    -Lisbon

     3.1 The Union Legal Order


     3.2 Legislative and Non
    -legislative Acts in EU Law



     3.3 Delegated and Implementing Acts in EU Law




     4 Delegated Rulemaking by the European Commission in Practice

     4.1 Empirical Data


     4.2 The Choice of Legislative Acts, Delegated and Implementing Acts




     5 Concluding Reflections


     6 Outlook




    Appendix


    Bibliography


    Index


    More
    Recently viewed
    previous
    20% %discount
    Law and Practices of Delegated Rulemaking by the European Commission

    Application of Nanomaterials in Chemical Sensors and Biosensors

    Chattopadhyay, Jayeeta; Srivastava, Nimmy;

    32 004 HUF

    25 603 HUF

    20% %discount
    Law and Practices of Delegated Rulemaking by the European Commission

    Mixed Methods Social Network Analysis: Theories and Methodologies in Learning and Education

    Froehlich, Dominik E.; Rehm, Martin; Rienties, Bart C.; (ed.)

    76 440 HUF

    61 152 HUF

    20% %discount
    Law and Practices of Delegated Rulemaking by the European Commission

    Learning to Make a Difference: Value Creation in Social Learning Spaces

    Wenger-Trayner, Etienne; Wenger-Trayner, Beverly;

    13 377 HUF

    10 702 HUF

    Law and Practices of Delegated Rulemaking by the European Commission

    Ultimate Realistic Rock Drum Method

    Appice, Carmine

    12 293 HUF

    11 310 HUF

    next