Product details:
ISBN13: | 9781633451537 |
ISBN10: | 1633451534 |
Binding: | Paperback |
No. of pages: | 48 pages |
Language: | English |
700 |
Category:
Frank Lloyd Wright: Broadacre City Project
Series:
MoMA One on One Series;
Publisher: Thames & Hudson
Date of Publication: 30 June 2024
Normal price:
Publisher's listprice:
GBP 14.99
GBP 14.99
Your price:
6 154 (5 861 HUF + 5% VAT )
discount is: 15% (approx 1 086 HUF off)
The discount is only available for 'Alert of Favourite Topics' newsletter recipients.
Click here to subscribe.
Click here to subscribe.
Availability:
Not yet published.
Long description:
This latest volume in the MoMA One on One series focuses on Frank Lloyd Wrights Broadacre City Project (19341935).
Frank Lloyd Wrights proposal for Broadacre City (192935) put forth a remarkable claimthat the metropolis was obsolete. In its place, Broadacre was to be a Usonian synthesis, an unprecedented landscape unsullied by convention or history, consisting simply of architecture and acreage. With its low-density carpet of small plots, predominantly one- and two-story buildings, and seemingly infinite territory, the ruralized landscape of Broadacre would sustain new levels of individuality and freedom, far more democratic than a traditional metropolis could ever support. Yet the 4-square-mile (10.4-squarekilometer) area of the Broadacre City model would give home to only 1,400 families, making the population density not quite urban or rural or suburban, but somehow their hybrid, with a social and spatial structure that eludes cleardefinition.
Frank Lloyd Wrights proposal for Broadacre City (192935) put forth a remarkable claimthat the metropolis was obsolete. In its place, Broadacre was to be a Usonian synthesis, an unprecedented landscape unsullied by convention or history, consisting simply of architecture and acreage. With its low-density carpet of small plots, predominantly one- and two-story buildings, and seemingly infinite territory, the ruralized landscape of Broadacre would sustain new levels of individuality and freedom, far more democratic than a traditional metropolis could ever support. Yet the 4-square-mile (10.4-squarekilometer) area of the Broadacre City model would give home to only 1,400 families, making the population density not quite urban or rural or suburban, but somehow their hybrid, with a social and spatial structure that eludes cleardefinition.