- Publisher's listprice GBP 27.99
-
13 372 Ft (12 735 Ft + 5% VAT)
The price is estimated because at the time of ordering we do not know what conversion rates will apply to HUF / product currency when the book arrives. In case HUF is weaker, the price increases slightly, in case HUF is stronger, the price goes lower slightly.
- Discount 10% (cc. 1 337 Ft off)
- Discounted price 12 035 Ft (11 462 Ft + 5% VAT)
Subcribe now and take benefit of a favourable price.
Subscribe
13 372 Ft
Availability
Estimated delivery time: Expected time of arrival: end of January 2026.
Not in stock at Prospero.
Why don't you give exact delivery time?
Delivery time is estimated on our previous experiences. We give estimations only, because we order from outside Hungary, and the delivery time mainly depends on how quickly the publisher supplies the book. Faster or slower deliveries both happen, but we do our best to supply as quickly as possible.
Product details:
- Publisher OUP Oxford
- Date of Publication 5 July 2018
- ISBN 9780198753858
- Binding Hardback
- No. of pages268 pages
- Size 242x162x20 mm
- Weight 536 g
- Language English 0
Categories
Short description:
Christine M. Korsgaard presents a compelling new view of our moral relationships to the other animals. She offers challenging answers to such questions as: Are people superior to animals, and does it matter morally if we are? Is it all right for us to eat animals, experiment on them, make them work for us, and keep them as pets?
MoreLong description:
Christine M. Korsgaard presents a compelling new view of humans' moral relationships to the other animals. She defends the claim that we are obligated to treat all sentient beings as what Kant called "ends-in-themselves". Drawing on a theory of the good derived from Aristotle, she offers an explanation of why animals are the sorts of beings for whom things can be good or bad. She then turns to Kant's argument for the value of humanity to show that rationality commits us to claiming the standing of ends-in-ourselves, in two senses. Kant argued that as autonomous beings, we claim to be ends-in-ourselves when we claim the standing to make laws for ourselves and each other. Korsgaard argues that as beings who have a good, we also claim to be ends-in-ourselves when we take the things that are good for us to be good absolutely and so worthy of pursuit. The first claim commits us to joining with other autonomous beings in relations of moral reciprocity. The second claim commits us to treating the good of every sentient creature as something of absolute importance.
Korsgaard argues that human beings are not more important than the other animals, that our moral nature does not make us superior to the other animals, and that our unique capacities do not make us better off than the other animals. She criticizes the "marginal cases" argument and advances a new view of moral standing as attaching to the atemporal subjects of lives. She criticizes Kant's own view that our duties to animals are indirect, and offers a non-utilitarian account of the relation between pleasure and the good. She also addresses a number of directly practical questions: whether we have the right to eat animals, experiment on them, make them work for us and fight in our wars, and keep them as pets; and how to understand the wrong that we do when we cause a species to go extinct.
...this book contributes to a new era for animals, based on yet another firm moral foundation.
Table of Contents:
Part One: Human Beings and the Other Animals
Are People More Important than the Other Animals?
Animal Selves and the Good
What's Different about Being Human?
The Case Against Human Superiority
Part Two: Immanuel Kant and the Animals
Kant, Marginal Cases, and Moral Standing
Kant Against the Animals, Part 1: The Indirect Duty View
Kant Against the Animals, Part 2: Reciprocity and the Grounds of Obligation
A Kantian Case for Our Obligations to the Other Animals
The Role of Pleasure and Pain
Part Three: Consequences
The Animal Antinomy, Part 1: Creation Ethics
Species, Communities, and Habitat Loss
The Animal Antinomy, Part 2: Abolition and Apartheid
