Common Heritage or Common Burden?
The United States Position on the Development of a Regime for Deep Sea-bed Mining in the Law of the Sea Convention
- Publisher's listprice GBP 147.50
-
70 468 Ft (67 112 Ft + 5% VAT)
The price is estimated because at the time of ordering we do not know what conversion rates will apply to HUF / product currency when the book arrives. In case HUF is weaker, the price increases slightly, in case HUF is stronger, the price goes lower slightly.
- Discount 10% (cc. 7 047 Ft off)
- Discounted price 63 421 Ft (60 401 Ft + 5% VAT)
Subcribe now and take benefit of a favourable price.
Subscribe
70 468 Ft
Availability
printed on demand
Why don't you give exact delivery time?
Delivery time is estimated on our previous experiences. We give estimations only, because we order from outside Hungary, and the delivery time mainly depends on how quickly the publisher supplies the book. Faster or slower deliveries both happen, but we do our best to supply as quickly as possible.
Product details:
- Publisher OUP Oxford
- Date of Publication 14 December 1989
- ISBN 9780198252276
- Binding Hardback
- No. of pages380 pages
- Size 224x144x27 mm
- Weight 636 g
- Language English
- Illustrations 1 line illus. 0
Categories
Long description:
Common Heritage or Common Burden? contains a comprehensive and authoritative assessment of the US role in the negotiations on the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea and particularly in the negotiations on one of the remaining commons, the ocean floor beyond national jurisdiction. The author first examines the US view of the lawfulness of deep seabed mining under international law. He reviews the bureaucratic struggles, within the US Administration and the Congress, concerning the options to be pursued at the Conference; analyses the US position in the seabed negotiations from 1974 to 1980; and casts a fresh look both on the Reagan Administration's `policy review' of 1981-1982 which threatened the Conference's outcome, and current US oceans policy which remains an impediment to the Convention's early entry into force.
The study suggests that despite significant compromises negotiated between the US and developing countries at the Conference up to 1980, the emerging seabed regime was not as widely endorsed by US officials as is generally assumed. Drawing on material collected from interviews with many key negotiators, the study contributes to a better understanding of domestic and international decision-making procedures and the dynamics of international negotiations.
`A comprehensive and authoritative assessment of the United States role in the negotiations on the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.'
IMM Abstracts
