Challenging the State: Devolution and the Battle for Partisan Credibility
A Comparison of Belgium, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom
Series: Comparative Politics;
- Publisher's listprice GBP 122.50
-
58 524 Ft (55 737 Ft + 5% VAT)
The price is estimated because at the time of ordering we do not know what conversion rates will apply to HUF / product currency when the book arrives. In case HUF is weaker, the price increases slightly, in case HUF is stronger, the price goes lower slightly.
- Discount 10% (cc. 5 852 Ft off)
- Discounted price 52 671 Ft (50 163 Ft + 5% VAT)
Subcribe now and take benefit of a favourable price.
Subscribe
58 524 Ft
Availability
printed on demand
Why don't you give exact delivery time?
Delivery time is estimated on our previous experiences. We give estimations only, because we order from outside Hungary, and the delivery time mainly depends on how quickly the publisher supplies the book. Faster or slower deliveries both happen, but we do our best to supply as quickly as possible.
Product details:
- Publisher OUP Oxford
- Date of Publication 26 April 2012
- ISBN 9780199691579
- Binding Hardback
- No. of pages278 pages
- Size 254x165x23 mm
- Weight 592 g
- Language English 0
Categories
Short description:
Why do national governments implement devolution given the high risk that it will encourage peripheral parties to demand ever more devolved powers? The aim of Challenging the State is to answer this question through a comparative analysis of devolution in four European countries: Belgium, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom.
MoreLong description:
How do state parties react to the challenge of peripheral parties demanding political power to be devolved to their culturally distinct territories? Is devolution the best response to these demands? Why do national governments implement devolution given the high risk that devolution will encourage peripheral parties to demand ever more devolved powers? The aim of this book is to answer these questions through a comparative analysis of devolution in four European countries: Belgium, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom. The author argues that electoral competition between state and peripheral parties pushes some state parties to prefer devolution at some particular point in time. Devolution is an electoral strategy adopted in order to make it more difficult in the long term for peripheral parties to increase their electoral support by claiming the monopoly of representation of the peripheral territory and the people in it. The strategy of devolution is preferred over short-term tactics of convergence towards the peripheral programmatic agenda because the pro-periphery tactics of state parties in unitary centralised states are not credible in the eyes of voters. The price that state parties pay for making their electoral tactics credible is the 'entrenchment' of the devolution programmatic agenda in the electoral arena. The final implication of this argument is that in democratic systems devolution is not a decision to protect the state from the secessionist threat. It is, instead, a decision by state parties to protect their needed electoral majorities.
Comparative Politics is a series for students, teachers, and researchers of political science that deals with contemporary government and politics. Global in scope, books in the series are characterised by a stress on comparative analysis and strong methodological rigour. The series is published in association with the European Consortium for Political Research. For more information visit: www.ecprnet.eu. The Comparative Politics series is edited by Professor David M. Farrell, School of Politics and International Relations, University College Dublin, Kenneth Carty, Professor of Political Science, University of British Columbia, and Professor Dirk Berg-Schlosser, Institute of Political Science, Philipps University, Marburg.
Alonso convincingly resolves this contradiction about center-periphery conflict and its related party competition.
Table of Contents:
The Centre-Periphery Conflict and Two Paradoxes
Centre-periphery Party Competition
Political Devolution and Credibility Constraints
Parties and Voters in Two Dimensions: A First Examination of the Landscape
The Emergence of the Peripheral Party Threat
Devolution: Making Electoral Moves Credible
State Parties' Electoral Strategies after Devolution
Peripheral Parties' Electoral Strategies after Devolution
Conclusions
