Short description:

Winner of the Gunnar Myrdal Prize of the European Association for Evolutionary Political Economy for 2009.

Developments within economics of incorporating the historical (and the social, institutional, etc more generally) have been welcomed as progress over excessive formalism and lack of realism. But, by situating these developments in terms of the shifting relationship between economics, the historical and an evolving economics imperialism, a fuller understanding of the role of economic theory and the historical is presented as a prerequisite for analysis that aspires fully to address economic and historical change.

Long description:

Economics has become a monolithic science, variously described as formalistic and autistic with neoclassical orthodoxy reigning supreme. So argue Dimitris Milonakis and Ben Fine in this new major work of critical recollection. The authors show how economics was once rich, diverse, multidimensional and pluralistic, and unravel the processes that lead to orthodoxy?s current predicament. The book details how political economy became economics through the desocialisation and the dehistoricisation of the dismal science, accompanied by the separation of economics from the other social sciences, especially economic history and sociology. It is argued that recent attempts from within economics to address the social and the historical have failed to acknowledge long standing debates amongst economists, historians and other social scientists. This has resulted in an impoverished historical and social content within mainstream economics.

The book ranges over the shifting role of the historical and the social in economic theory, the shifting boundaries between the economic and the non-economic, all within a methodological context. Schools of thought and individuals, that have been neglected or marginalised, are treated in full, including classical political economy and Marx, the German and British historical schools, American institutionalism, Weber and Schumpeter and their programme of Socialökonomik, and the Austrian school. At the same time, developments within the mainstream tradition from marginalism through Marshall and Keynes to general equilibrium theory are also scrutinised, and the clashes between the various camps from the famous Methodenstreit to the fierce debates of the 1930s and beyond brought to the fore.

The prime rationale underpinning this account drawn from the past is to put the case for political economy back on the agenda. This is done by treating economics as a social science once again, rather than as a positive science, as has been the inclination since the time of Jevons and Walras. It involves transcending the boundaries of the social sciences, but in a particular way that is in exactly the opposite direction now being taken by "economics imperialism". Drawing on the rich traditions of the past, the reintroduction and full incorporation of the social and the historical into the main corpus of political economy will be possible in the future.

Table of Contents:

1 Introduction, 2 Smith, Ricardo and the First Rupture in Economic Thought, 3 Mill?s Conciliation, Marx?s Transgression, 4 Political Economy as History: Smith, Ricardo, Marx, 5 Not by Theory Alone: German Historismus, 6 Marginalism and the Methodenstreit, 7 The Marshallian Heritage, 8 British Historical Economics and the Birth of Economic History, 9 Thorstein Veblen: Economics as a Broad Science, 10 Commons, Mitchell, Ayres and the Fin de Si?cle of American Institutionalism, 11 In the Slipstream of Marginalism: Weber, Schumpeter and Sozialökonomik, 12 Positivism and the Separation of Economics from Sociology, 13 From Menger to Hayek: The (Re)Making of the Austrian School, 14 From Keynes to General Equilibrium: Short and Long Run Revolutions in Economic Theory, 15. Beyond the Formalist Revolution