Biodiversity Offsets Between Regulation and Voluntary Commitment: A Typology of Approaches Towards Environmental Compensation and No Net Loss of Biodiversity

Biodiversity Offsets Between Regulation and Voluntary Commitment

A Typology of Approaches Towards Environmental Compensation and No Net Loss of Biodiversity
 
Edition number: 1st ed. 2020
Publisher: Springer
Date of Publication:
Number of Volumes: 1 pieces, Book
 
Normal price:

Publisher's listprice:
EUR 171.19
Estimated price in HUF:
70 641 HUF (67 277 HUF + 5% VAT)
Why estimated?
 
Your price:

64 990 (61 895 HUF + 5% VAT )
discount is: 8% (approx 5 651 HUF off)
The discount is only available for 'Alert of Favourite Topics' newsletter recipients.
Click here to subscribe.
 
Availability:

Uncertain availability. Please turn to our customer service.
Can't you provide more accurate information?
 
 
 
 
 
Product details:

ISBN13:9783030255930
ISBN10:303025593X
Binding:Hardback
No. of pages:341 pages
Size:235x155 mm
Weight:723 g
Language:English
Illustrations: 19 Illustrations, black & white; 86 Illustrations, color; 55 Tables, color
0
Category:
Short description:

We are witnessing an alarming, global biodiversity crisis with an ongoing loss of species and their habitats. In response, a number of tools and approaches ? including some that are contested ? are being explored and promoted. Biodiversity offsets are one such approach, and deserve critical examination since the debate surrounding them has often been oversimplified and lacking practical evidence. As such, this study presents a refined typology including seven types of biodiversity offsets and taking into account different contexts, governance arrangements and drivers. It draws on a detailed analysis of theoretical concepts to explain the voluntary implementation of biodiversity offsets using an internet-based (netnographic) research approach. Furthermore it builds on a broad global explorative base of 72 practical examples and presents in-depth case studies for each type. The results reveal a number of global tendencies that allow recommendations to be made for different locations, contexts and stakeholders. They also encourage the expansion of this research field to respond to the pressing needs of policy and practice.


Long description:

We are witnessing an alarming, global biodiversity crisis with an ongoing loss of species and their habitats. In response, a number of tools and approaches ? including some that are contested ? are being explored and promoted. Biodiversity offsets are one such approach, and deserve critical examination since the debate surrounding them has often been oversimplified and lacking practical evidence. As such, this study presents a refined typology including seven types of biodiversity offsets and taking into account different contexts, governance arrangements and drivers. It draws on a detailed analysis of theoretical concepts to explain the voluntary implementation of biodiversity offsets using an internet-based (netnographic) research approach. Furthermore it builds on a broad global explorative base of 72 practical examples and presents in-depth case studies for each type. The results reveal a number of global tendencies that allow recommendations to be made for different locations, contexts and stakeholders. They also encourage the expansion of this research field to respond to the pressing needs of policy and practice.


Table of Contents:
 
-
-
-  preliminary  
-
-
-  


Forword
Executive summary
1Introduction, problem statement and research questions17
1.1Introduction to the context for biodiversity offsets: from biodiversity loss to no net loss of biodiversity17
1.2Introduction to the concept of biodiversity offsets21
1.3Problems of biodiversity offsets, research gaps and problem statement 26
1.4Aim and research design 36
2 Scientific Methods 43
2.1General methodology of an internet based research43
2.1.1Introduction to web 2.0 and the role of cyberscience for academic research45
2.1.2The netnographic approach51
2.1.3Research process of internet based (web 1.0 and web 2.0) research ? the RUDE procedure52
2.1.4Variety and choice of tools for research in a web 2.0 environment54
2.2Typification and categorization as a scientific method59
2.2.1Definition, terminology and scope: ideal vs. empirical types59
2.2.2Theoretical concepts of empirically grounded typification: the attribute space after Lazarsfeld and Barton61
2.3Methods for empirical analysis and sampling63
2.3.1Methods and materials of data collection63
2.3.2Methods for sampling as basis for choice of case studies64
3The concept of voluntariness67
3.1Defining and understanding the notion of voluntariness and its prerequisites: definition, terminology and scope69
3.1.1Descriptive approach69
3.1.2Normative approach73
3.2General theoretical concepts to analyse or explain voluntariness78
3.2.1The egoism
-altruism paradigm78
3.2.2Economic theories81
3.3Governance and Duty of Care for Biodiversity85
3.4Voluntary environmental approaches87
3.5Willingness to Pay96
3.6Corporate (Environmental or Social) Responsibility97
4Voluntariness of biodiversity offsets111
4.1Biodiversity Offsets and regulation111
4.1.1US Wetland Mitigation113
4.1.2German Impact Mitigation Regulation116
4.1.3Situation in the EU and planned No Net Loss Initiative of the European Commission118
4.2The business case for biodiversity offsets124
4.2.1Does the ?business case? imply voluntary biodiversity offsets?125
4.2.2What are the motives and goals of the ?business case??126
4.2.3What is the business in the ?business case?, i.e. are biodiversity offsets a business?127
4.2.4Summing up: what is the business case ? an approximation128
4.3Common standards for biodiversity offsets130
5Deduction of a typology of biodiversity offsets139
5.1Deduction of an impressionistic classification of types139
5.1.1Step 1: dichotomy between mandatory and voluntary biodiversity offsets139
5.1.2Step 2: Typology with four biodiversity offset types (building on pressures and incentives)140
5.1.3Step 3: Updated typology with six biodiversity offset types (as of August 2014)141
5.1.4Results of the impressionistic classification143
5.2Derivation of relevant attributes/criteria for voluntariness from the theory144
5.2.1Degree or intensity of voluntariness144
5.2.2Threshold criteria146
5.2.3Core criteria147
5.2.4Descriptive criteria150
5.2.5Performance criteria152
5.2.6Quality criteria153
5.2.7Rejected criteria154
5.2.8Measurement and value categories of the criteria154
5.3Substruction of the underlying attribute space and combinations of attributes156
5.4Transformation (rectification) of the impressionistic types and analysis of meaningful correlations158
5.5Screening of biodiversity offset cases worldwide and grouping of cases according to the built types161
6Illustrative case studies for the built types of biodiversity offsets165
6.1Type 1: regulatory offsets166
6.1.1General description166
6.1.2Case study for regulatory offsets: Koala Offset in South East Queensland167
6.2Type 2: conditional offsets171
6.2.1General description171
6.2.2Case study for conditional offsets: Nam Theun 2 Hydropower project in Laos174
6.3Type 3: enabled offsets179
6.3.1General description179
6.3.2Case study for enabled offsets: Blakely Harbour residential and public road development on Bainbridge Island in the US (BBOP and City of Bainbridge biodiversity offset pilot)181
6.4Type 4: sectoral offsets187
6.4.1General description187
6.4.2Case study for sectoral offsets189
6.5Type 5: corporate offsets190
6.5.1General description190
6.5.2Case study for corporate offsets: QIT Mining Madagascar QMM (ilmenite mining)192
6.6Type 6: local/consensual offsets196
6.6.1General description196
6.6.2Case study for local offsets: Network Rail?s Thameslink railway project in the UK197
6.7Type 7: altruistic offsets203
6.7.1General description203
6.7.2Case study for altruistic offsets: Antamina mine in Peru204
7Discussion209
7.1Discussion and critique of methodology209
7.1.1Appropriateness of the research methodology209
7.1.2Mixed types ? the limits of typification to represent real world examples211
7.1.3Difficulties of comparability and clear classification of biodiversity offsets211
7.2Discussion of the research hypotheses216
7.3Discussion of the single types219
7.3.1Magnitude, location and particularities of type 1 regulatory offsets219
7.3.2Magnitude, location and particularities of type 2: conditional offsets224
7.3.3Magnitude, location and particularities of type 3: enabled offsets227
7.3.4Magnitude, location and particularities of type 4 sectoral offsets231
7.3.5Magnitude, location and particularities of type 5: corporate offsets233
7.3.6Magnitude, location and particularities of type 6: local offsets236
7.3.7Magnitude, location and particularities of type 7: altruistic offsets239
7.4Discussion of the typology243
7.4.1Differences between the types243
7.4.2Similarities and overlap between the types246
7.4.3Limitations of the typology247
8Conclusion and contextualization of the results251
8.1Conclusions from the built typology251
8.1.1Stakeholder orientation ? which conclusions can be drawn on the roles and responsibilities of different actors?251
8.1.2The way ahead ? which of the offset types are promising and why?255
8.1.3Global variety
- what are the implications for different contexts worldwide?259
8.1.4Application spectrum
- what can the typology be used for?260
8.2Contextualization: Bringing together the theoretical fundamentals with the practical evidence on offsets263
8.2.1How do biodiversity offsets fit into the nature conservation toolbox?263
8.2.2How can the results of this study inform the theoretical discussion on voluntariness in environmental protection?264
9Outlook and further research267
9.1Discussion of the appropriateness of biodiversity offsets vs. the commodification of nature269
9.2Outcome of biodiversity offsets and need for an evaluation of effectiveness and efficiency of compensation approaches273
9.3Need for a broader empirical base of implemented biodiversity offset cases276
9.4Concluding remarks278
10References279
11Annex307